Outcomes for Children With HL: Effects of Age of ID, Sign Support, and Auditory Prosthesis The purpose of the project reported here was to examine the effects of three independent variables on developmental outcomes for children with hearing loss (HL): age of identification of hearing loss, whether or not spoken language input was supported with signs and whether children used hearing aids (HAs) or cochlear ... Article
Article  |   October 01, 2008
Outcomes for Children With HL: Effects of Age of ID, Sign Support, and Auditory Prosthesis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Susan Nittrouer
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Article Information
Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants & Assistive Technology / Articles
Article   |   October 01, 2008
Outcomes for Children With HL: Effects of Age of ID, Sign Support, and Auditory Prosthesis
SIG 9 Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders in Childhood, October 2008, Vol. 18, 74-82. doi:10.1044/hhdc18.2.74
SIG 9 Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders in Childhood, October 2008, Vol. 18, 74-82. doi:10.1044/hhdc18.2.74
Abstract

The purpose of the project reported here was to examine the effects of three independent variables on developmental outcomes for children with hearing loss (HL): age of identification of hearing loss, whether or not spoken language input was supported with signs and whether children used hearing aids (HAs) or cochlear implants (CI). Children with and without hearing loss were tested multiple times between 12 and 48 months of age, at their 6-month birthdays. Dependent variables were selected to examine all aspects of child development: receptive and expressive language, psychosocial components of personality, deleterious behaviors, adaptive behaviors, parental language style, and levels of parenting stress. Results support several main findings:

  1. None of the independent variables had any significant effect on any dependent variable unrelated to language.

  2. Mean levels of all language skills were delayed for all groups of children with HL, even those children identified at birth with only moderate losses that could be appropriately aided with HAs.

  3. For children with losses identified at birth, the use or nonuse of signs to support spoken language input did not affect language outcomes in the long run.

  4. Within the restricted range examined here, age of identification did not affect language outcomes, if children were not getting sign support; children with late-identified hearing loss receiving sign support were more delayed on all language measures than other children with HL.

  5. Regarding prosthesis, some experience using HAs was associated with better outcomes, even if children eventually received CIs.

  6. A parental language style that involved being very verbally responsive to the child's communicative attempts was strongly associated with positive language outcomes.

Become a SIG Affiliate
Pay Per View
Entire SIG 9 Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders in Childhood content & archive
24-hour access
This Issue
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access
We've Changed Our Publication Model...
The 19 individual SIG Perspectives publications have been relaunched as the new, all-in-one Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.